🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.